SEC hits BlockFi with a $100 million penalty, gives 60 days to comply with a 1940 law

Published at: Feb. 14, 2022

On Feb. 14, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, announced actions against crypto lending company BlockFi over its failure to register high-yield interest accounts that the agency deems to be securities.

New Jersey-based BlockFi will pay $50 million in settlement to the SEC and another $50 million to 32 U.S. states that brought similar charges. This marks some of the heaviest penalties ever imposed by a U.S. federal regulator on a cryptocurrency service provider. The firm also agreed to stop onboarding new customers to the unregistered service, BlockFi Interest Accounts, and attempt to bring it into compliance with the Investment Company Act of 1940 within the next 60 days.

BlockFi Interest Accounts, launched in March 2019, allowed investors to lend their crypto assets to the platform in exchange for monthly interest payments of up to 9.5% — significantly higher rates than interest-bearing deposit accounts in most traditional financial institutions offer.

Despite a widespread critique that securities laws written in the 1930-s and 1940-s could have limited applicability to digital asset-based products, the SEC chairman Gary Gensler lauded the settlement as an instructive precedent for crypto lending platforms. Gensler said in a statement:

Today’s settlement makes clear that crypto markets must comply with time-tested securities laws, such as the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940. It further demonstrates the Commission’s willingness to work with crypto platforms to determine how they can come into compliance with those laws.

Cryptocurrency lending products have begun attracting increased scrutiny from both federal and state regulators last September. According to a January report, the SEC was investigating products similar to BlockFi Interest Accounts offered by Gemini, Celsius Network and Voyager Digital to determine whether these offerings constituted securities.

Tags
Regulation
United States
Sec
Bitcoin Regulation
Cryptocurrencies
Government
Us Government
Lending
Fines
Related Posts
Crypto-friendly faces poised for positions in Biden administration
As the United States Senate begins confirming leadership posts across commerce and the treasury, there has been meaningful momentum in the crypto community as a response. This is due to the profiles of various individuals who have been reportedly nominated, as well as the anticipated economic measures by the coming administration — both of which are expected to nurture positive momentum for crypto growth. While a few official appointments have been made with numerous confirmations pending, others are still at the nomination stage. Let’s take a quick loop around the swamp. The Treasury Confirmed with 84 votes, Janet Yellen will …
Blockchain / Feb. 7, 2021
U.S. Congressman calls for ‘Broad, bipartisan consensus’ on important issues of digital asset policy
In a letter to the leadership of the United States House Financial Services Committee, ranking member Patrick McHenry took a jab at “inconsistent treatment and jurisdictional uncertainty” inherent in U.S. crypto regulation and called for the Committee to take on its critical issues. McHenry, a Republican representing North Carolina, opened by mentioning that the Committee’s Democrat Chairwoman Maxine Waters is looking to schedule additional hearings addressing matters pertinent to the digital asset industry. He further stressed the need for identifying and prioritizing the key issues and achieving a “broad, bipartisan consensus” on the matters affecting the industry that holds immense …
Regulation / Jan. 25, 2022
Stealth rulemaking: Is proposed SEC rule with no mention of crypto a threat to DeFi?
On Jan. 26, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission proposed amendments to Rule 3b-16 under the Exchange Act that lacks any mention of digital assets or decentralized finance, which could adversely affect platforms that facilitate crypto transactions. Some cryptocurrency advocates — including SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce — believe that the commission’s extended definition of an exchange could thrust an entire class of crypto entities under the regulator’s jurisdiction, subjecting them to additional registration and reporting burdens. How real is the threat? The proposed change The amendments proposed by the regulator dramatically expand the definition of what an exchange is …
Regulation / Feb. 5, 2022
The SEC was right to whack Kim Kardashian for shilling Ethereum Max
The charges incited a public debate — is the requirement to disclose the amount paid to promote an investment opportunity important? What’s new? Celebrities and social media influencers have long enjoyed a lucrative revenue stream in promoting and endorsing services and products ranging from clothing to beauty products, and even supplements and medications. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulates endorsements by requiring various acts and disclosures, including whether a financial relationship exists between the endorser and the company, whether a post was paid for and even by requiring an endorser to personally try a product before endorsing it. Still, the …
Regulation / Oct. 12, 2022
SEC open meeting on Dec 2 to include crypto panel discussion
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, announced Nov 24 the title of the upcoming crypto panel for its Dec 2 Investor Advisory Meeting will be “Helping to Ensure Investor Protection and Market Integrity in the Face of New Technologies”. Previously on Nov 15, the Commission announced the meeting would be open to the public. Panelists and moderators will attend remotely. The crypto panel discussion agenda will focus on the regulatory framework covering digital assets, market structure issues, and defining risk in emerging technologies. Additional topics are expected to include blockchain technologies, crypto-based EFTs, and stablecoins. Half of the …
Adoption / Nov. 24, 2021