New Jersey Introduces Bill to Regulate Cryptocurrencies at State Level

Published at: Feb. 24, 2020

The New Jersey state legislature is now considering a new bill that would require cryptocurrency businesses to obtain a proper license to operate.

Assemblywoman Yvonne Lopez proposed the Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act on Feb. 20. The legislation would establish new requirements for virtual currency businesses and create consumer-friendly protections by requiring crypto firms to disclose their legally registered names, Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Anti-Terrorist Financing (ATF) policies, and their licensing and legal history to the State of New Jersey’s Department of Banking and Insurance. 

Bitcoin regulation in the United States hasn’t been fully addressed

Though the largest Bitcoin surge happened over three years ago, there were no state regulations surrounding cryptocurrency in New Jersey. Unlicensed crypto operators had to be tried on a federal level through the Department of Justice. Lopez highlighted the need to address these issues locally:

“People see and hear about [Bitcoin] in their day-to-day lives, but most are not quite sure what it is. We must take steps to protect consumers looking to invest in cryptocurrency, while also allowing the sector to continue to develop and expand in New Jersey.”

The bill also requires crypto companies to disclose their terms and conditions for consumer accounts and their they are protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Cooperation (FDIC), as are traditional bank account holders. Anyone applying would need to provide a schedule of fees, and any information regarding the risks of investing in digital assets.

“With this legislation, consumers will be better-informed of the risks involved when investing in virtual currency.”

By introducing a state-level licensing scheme, New Jersey would join its neighbor New York in requiring cryptocurrency firms to obtain special permission to operate. In 2014, New York financial regulators introduced the BitLicense, making it one of the toughest jurisdictions in the union for cryptocurrency-related firms to operate.

Tags
Regulation
United States
Cryptocurrencies
Related Posts
Crypto language in the infrastructure bill is a political shell game, says Cointelegraph GC
Zachary Kelman, general counsel of Cointelegraph, said that the political fight over the tax implications for crypto in the United States infrastructure bill is nothing new, as it’s likely about how lawmakers plan to pay for everything. In an interview with Cointelegraph's Jackson DuMont, Kelman claimed that senators pushing the crypto language in the infrastructure bill — which ultimately passed in the U.S. Senate after one senator objected to a clarifying amendment — may have been more influenced by political concerns than ones potentially affecting the crypto space. Namely, the general counsel claimed that lawmakers know that crypto firms “can't …
Regulation / Aug. 18, 2021
What the SEC can learn from the German regulator
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s chairperson Gary Gensler announced this month that the crypto industry should not escape the purview of the regulator. He highlighted that decentralized finance (DeFi) trading and lending protocols need particular attention when it comes to investor protections. Regulation can extend into a menu of options that covers custody, reporting, counterparty verification and asset classification and issuance. Reports are surfacing that people are waiting with bated breath on how the SEC will regulate the DeFi industry, but Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, also known as BaFin, has found a way to apply existing securities …
Technology / Aug. 12, 2021
XRP purchasers back Ripple, arguing that it is not a security
On Dec. 22, 2020, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Ripple Labs. The complaint essentially alleged that Ripple had engaged in a multi-year, sustained practice of illegally selling unregistered, non-exempt securities in the form of its XRP tokens. This complaint, having been filed on the last day of former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton’s tenure at the commission, led to a considerable volume of public commentary, as is not unusual for SEC litigation against major players in the crypto space. What is unusual about SEC versus Ripple is the reaction from a sizable segment of XRP …
Technology / March 21, 2021
ICO Rating Settles With SEC Over Alleged Anti-Touting Violations
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Russian analytical agency ICO Rating for $268,998 for violating anti-touting provisions, according to an announcement on Aug. 20. In the announcement, the SEC claimed that ICO Rating violated the anti-touting provisions of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 by failing to disclose payments it received from initial coin offering (ICO) issuers it rated and published on its platform. Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division, said: “The securities laws require promoters, including both people and entities, to disclose compensation they receive for touting investments so that …
Blockchain / Aug. 20, 2019
Is US politics divisive enough to make crypto a partisan issue?
As the perceived legitimacy of blockchain technology increases, politicians in the U.S. have shown a growing interest in turning this non-partisan technology into a topic of political divisiveness. Speaking via video to an audience of the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in Singapore on Friday, former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said while cryptocurrencies were an “interesting” technology, they also had the power to undermine the U.S. dollar and destabilize nations — “perhaps starting with small ones but going much larger.” While no longer the leader of the Democratic Party, Clinton’s sentiment on crypto resembles that of top Democrat and senator Elizabeth …
Regulation / Nov. 19, 2021