Most of China’s DLT Firms That Closed in 2019 Were Scams or Poorly Planned

Published at: April 6, 2020

Most of the blockchain firms that closed in 2019 were cryptocurrency scams or had deficient business models, according to recent research.

Research sent to Cointelegraph by Chinese think tank EqualOcean on March 26 suggests that most blockchain-backed Chinese businesses that halted their activity last year had major flaws.

Short-lived companies

The report found over 70 blockchain projects that shut their doors last year. Among them over 70% of the projects reportedly did not survive their first year and 30% did not last 6 months. The research reads:

“A considerable number of which were crypto exchanges that involved scams, digital wallets and decentralized applications that used multiple-level marketing, and public blockchains that did not have a defined business model.”

Per the report, “China's blockchain scene in 2019 was more or less like a slow recovery after a high fever.” Overall, last year China’s blockchain space reportedly got rid of the scams and turned to real-world applications of distributed ledger technology.

The researchers behind the report said that during 2019 blockchain awareness in China increased among state bodies and state-owned enterprises. The researchers also point out that in October China’s president Xi Jinping called for the country to accelerate blockchain adoption. An EqualOcean spokesperson told Cointelegraph:

“With support from the public sector, the scope of real-world business scenarios is likely to be boosted considerably this year. Especially in areas adjacent to the DCEP, supply chain and e-government. This imposes feel-good factors for permission blockchain players in particular.”

Furthermore, the firm’s representative said that public blockchains — on the other hand — have still a long way to go. Still, the researchers “project changes in side-chain and cross-chain areas, stirred by the expanding DeFi ecosystem.” They also told Cointelegraph:

“A crypto market, as it’s known in most of the western countries, can’t appear in China in the near future due to the specific regulatory environment: we don’t see how decentralized currencies can avoid possible clashes with the local financial watchdogs. Nonetheless, the country’s enterprises will continue to dominate in several essential subsectors. An epitome of such a company is ASIC giant Bitmain, a monopolist in the global mining hardware market.”

China’s blockchain developments

Chinese officials see great potential in blockchain technology and its digitization potential. As Cointelegraph recently reported, the country is stepping ever-closer to releasing its central bank digital currency.

Still, after hype tapered off, salaries for blockchain-related jobs decreased by 37% in China.

Tags
Related Posts
Shanghai Man: VeChain on TV, DOGE flips BTC volume, Hotbit hack and more ...
This weekly roundup of news from Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong attempts to curate the industry’s most important news, including influential projects, changes in the regulatory landscape, and enterprise blockchain integrations. Will DOGEmania ever stop? Dogecoin has officially flipped Bitcoin in a few categories here in China, with DOGE trading volume on leading Chinese exchange Huobi surpassing that of leading assets ETH and BTC. On May 6th, according to CoinGecko, DOGE volume made up more than 15% of total exchange volume, whereas BTC and ETH were around 8% each. Searches for ‘Dogecoin’ on WeChat surpassed searches for Bitcoin, with …
Adoption / May 6, 2021
NEO price climbs after China’s BSN gives the project the green light on NFT marketplaces
As the field of viable layer-one blockchain protocols continues to expand with newer entrants trying to solve the issue of high transaction costs and slow processing times, older projects find themselves utilizing their history and track record to set themselves apart and secure a market share that will ensure their survival through the next market cycle. Neo (NEO) fits the bill described above and the project is attempting to stage a revival in 2022 as governments around the world slowly open to the fact that blockchains and digital currencies have certain benefits that can be integrated into public and private …
Blockchain / Feb. 16, 2022
Neo users explain why they've held on to the project despite China's heavy crypto crackdown
It's been a wild ride for Neo (dubbed "Ethereum of China") investors in the past few years, especially as China began to incrementally introduce harsher crypto regulations. But despite the odds, the community appears to be resilient, with a dedicated society of developers worldwide and a bourgeoning decentralized finance, or DeFi, hub that came into prominence via the launch of Neo N3 mainnet last year. As told by Neo investors Lucas and Jiří, who spoke to Cointelegraph, they were not expecting such a "huge drop in price" for Neo. Still, they nevertheless decided to hold their Neo tokens through all …
Decentralization / Feb. 28, 2022
Our Man in Shanghai: Huobi to become Grayscale of Asia, Yao Ming’s NFT wine and more ...
This weekly roundup of news from Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong attempts to curate the industry’s most important news, including influential projects, changes in the regulatory landscape, and enterprise blockchain integrations. Huobi Asset Management is looking to be the Grayscale of Asia with the launch of four cryptocurrency-related tracker funds. The funds include a Bitcoin Fund, an Ethereum fund, a multi-asset basket of digital currencies, and a private equity fund for mining businesses. The aim is clearly to entice major institutional investors into the space with a product that feels familiar. The fund and asset management company is set …
Technology / April 30, 2021
Impermanent loss challenges the claim that DeFi is the ‘future of France’
Impermanent loss is one of the most recognized risks that investors have to contend with when providing liquidity to an automated market maker (AMM) in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector. Although it is not an actual loss incurred from the liquidity provider’s (LP) position — rather an opportunity cost that occurs when compared with simply buying and holding the same assets — the possibility of getting less value back at withdrawal is enough to keep many investors away from DeFi. Impermanent loss is driven by the volatility between the two assets in the equal-ratio pool — the more one asset …
Blockchain / March 5, 2022