Court finds blockchain firm guilty of license violation — but CEO vows to fight back

Published at: Oct. 1, 2020

Dutch open-source blockchain software developer Jelurida has won its case in the Netherlands against Apollo Fintech for breach of copyright.

On Sept. 22, a Dutch court ruled against Apollo for cloning over 75% of its code from Jelurida’s Nxt (NXT) blockchain software code but failing to adhere to the developer’s Jelurida Public License (JPL). Alongside Nxt, Jelurida is also the developer of the Ardor blockchain.

JPL permits other developers to freely use and modify Jelurida’s code for the Nxt blockchain — but its terms stipulate that they must keep it in the “copyleft” spirit of open source and distribute their derived products under the conditions of the public license. 

Apollo purportedly breached these conditions by replacing the JPL in its software with a proprietary license in Oct. 2019.

To win the case, Jelurida provided the court with evidence that “75.39% of Apollo code by lines is directly or indirectly dependent on NXT code.” Having proved this, the judge ruled that Apollo must fulfil its obligations under JPL within the territory of the Netherlands and must issue a recall of its products to all its clients in the Netherlands within seven days.

The fintech was also ordered to disclose information relating to the Apollo software it distributed, including sales prices, profit calculations, and the names of those involved in the software’s distribution within the Netherlands. Lastly, the company has to foot Jelurida’s legal bill of 38,781 euro ($45,470).

According to Jelurida, Apollo has now chosen to voluntarily drop a lawsuit its affiliates in the United States had attempted to initiate against Jelurida, alleging harassment.

However, speaking to Cointelegraph, Apollo CEO Stephen McCullah contended that the legal battle was far from over.

McCullah argued that Jelurida’s case was motivated by competition, and that Jelurida did not have the rights to change the terms of their license from open-source to a paid JPL. He also alleged that some of Nxt’s original developers were not aware that Jelurida was using Nxt.

Characterizing the Netherlands suit as “pointless,” McCullah claimed that Apollo had “added an open source license on top of [the JPL], which pertained to only our [Apollo’s] code additions. Their code was always 100% protected by their license.”

The CEO said that Apollo has not had any sales in the Netherlands that will be affected by the ruling. In the near future, he said Apollo will need to establish a special wallet for the Netherlands with the JPL displayed, “until we get our desired outcome to dissolve their rights and make it open source.”

Per McCullah, Apollo will pursue legal action in the U.S. where he believes the firm can get at least partial rights to NXT's code.

"Our top priority is to get a judgment to remove Jelurida’s paid license, so that NXT can rightfully go back to being an open source project," he said.

Jelurida director and co-founder Lior Yaffe told Cointelegraph: 

“One of the reasons to bring the Apollo case to court was to show once and for all that open source licenses are as valid and binding as commercial licenses. Some people believe that, when the source code is available, they can do anything they want with it, while in fact some open source licenses, and especially the 'copyleft' ones, have additional requirements.”

Acknowledging that some have argued against the proliferation of too many different types of open-source licenses, Jaffe said that the existing options “are not always the best fit.” 

JPL, Yaffe said, “takes into account that today the value of a blockchain project is not only in the code, but in the unique blockchain instance and cryptocurrency token maintained by this project with its developers, community and holders,” all of whose interest is to “preserve and increase” the token’s value.

Whatever the eventual outcome of the two companies’ competing claims, the legal fight over license of the code appears set to continue.

Tags
Law
Related Posts
SEC vs. Telegram: Part 2 — The case against integrating the two prongs of a SAFT
As discussed in the previous article, Telegram is a popular global instant messaging company. In 2018, it sold contractual rights to acquire a new crypto asset that it was developing (to be called Grams) to a group of accredited (and wealthy) investors around the world. Telegram raised about $1.7 billion from 171 investors, including 39 U.S. purchasers. This was a prelude to the planned launch of Grams, which was to occur about a year and a half later in October 2019. This two-step process — where a crypto entrepreneur sells contractual rights to acquire a crypto asset upon launch in …
Technology / Sept. 22, 2020
The Bitcoin Family talks about traveling, giving and orange-pilling
Seasoned crypto enthusiasts will remember Didi Taihuttu as the man who went all-in on Bitcoin (BTC) in 2016. He sold his and his family’s possessions. camping out in the Netherlands while he waited for Bitcoin to the moon. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Taihuttu recalls how it felt to own almost nothing but Bitcoin, 6 years ago: “I don’t have any cars, motorbikes, nothing. And I’m happier than ever. And she [Taihuttu's wife] agrees! At that moment we decide to break that chain and lead by example for the kids.” He explains his realization that life is about accumulating happiness, …
Adoption / March 2, 2022
Crypto inheritance: Are HODLers doomed to rely on centralized options?
Self-sovereignty is a core principle in the cryptocurrency space: Investors need to rely on a trustless, decentralized network instead of a central entity that has been known to devalue the holdings of others. One shortcoming associated with self-sovereignty, however, is inheritance. An estimated 4 million Bitcoin (BTC) has been lost over time and now sits in inaccessible wallets. How many of those coins belong to HODLers who passed away without sharing access to their wallets with anyone else is unknown? Some believe Satoshi Nakamoto’s estimated 1 million BTC fortune hasn’t been touched for this very reason: No one else had …
Adoption / May 23, 2022
Ideas vs. practice: How are regulators working together on crypto?
The regulation of cryptocurrencies across the world is a constant battle for investors in a rapidly expanding and constantly changing ecosystem. Various regulatory agencies around the world view digital assets in a different light that vary significantly from one another. Recently, executive board member of the European Central Bank (ECB) Fabio Panetta mentioned in a written statement for a speech to Columbia University that regulators should follow a globally coordinated approach while regulating digital assets. He said that the world should have digital assets regulated by the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) rules of the …
Decentralization / May 25, 2022
Ava Labs CEO denies CryptoLeaks' claims as 'conspiracy theory nonsense'
Ava Labs CEO Emin Gün Sirer has dismissed sensational allegations from CryptoLeaks that his company used litigation to “harm” competitors and fool regulators, labeling it as “conspiracy theory nonsense.” Sirer made the comments in an Aug. 28 Twitter post to his 280,500 followers, referring to an Aug. 26 article from CryptoLeaks alleging the company formed a “secret pact” with U.S. law firm Roche Freedman to use the American legal system “gangster style” to “attack and harm crypto organizations." How could anyone believe something so ridiculous as the conspiracy theory nonsense on Cryptoleaks? We would never engage in the unlawful, unethical …
Blockchain / Aug. 29, 2022