US SEC Report Notes Trading Suspensions, Actions Against Crypto Firms in 2019

Published at: Nov. 6, 2019

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) suspended securities trading of 271 issuers this year, including some digital assets. The SEC released its annual report for the fiscal year of 2019 on Nov. 6, in which the regulator also noted that the number of suspensions is only slightly lower than last year’s 280.

31 court-ordered asset freezes in 2019

The report notes a Nevada company that falsely claimed to have partnered with an SEC-qualified custodian for its crypto transactions and to offer an SEC-regulated token offering as an example.

In April, the SEC temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the cryptocurrency exchange Bitcoin Generation, “due to concerns about the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace.”

The SEC also obtained 31 court-ordered asset freezes in 2019, up from 26 in 2018 over various misconducts. Per the report, the SEC took action against a number of digital asset issuers over fraud or violating the registration provisions of federal securities law in 2019.

This year also saw the regulator file the first charges for unlawful promotion of crypto assets against two celebrities who did not disclose that they were paid for the exposure, producer DJ Khaled and pro boxer Floyd Mayweather.  

The SEC also took similar action against an initial coin offering (ICO) rating site, ICO Rating, that did not disclose that projects had paid for coverage. The commission eventually settled with the analytics site, charing it $268,998 for violating anti-touting provisions.

The securities watchdog also collected more than $4.3 billion in disgorgement and penalties in 2019 with 862 enforcement actions, stating that nearly $1.2 billion was returned to harmed investors. Regarding its actions against noncompliant digital currency firms and offerings, the commission concluded:

“Collectively, these actions send the clear message that, if a product is a security, regardless of the label attached to it, those who issue, promote, or provide a platform for buying and selling that security must comply with the investor protection requirements of the federal securities laws.”

The SEC continues to go after unregistered offerings

As Cointelegraph recently reported, the CEO of Delaware-registered blockchain firm Veritaseum LLC and New York-registered Veritaseum Inc., Reggie Middleton, was ordered to pay $8.4 million in disgorgement following a court order. The disgorgement represents a part of illegally earned profits as well as prejudgment interest of half a million dollars. 

The SEC brought its case against Vertaseum and its CEO in August when it claimed that the entities conducted a fraudulent and unregistered ICO from late 2017 to 2018.

Tags
Sec
Related Posts
It is time for the US to create a ‘Ripple test’ for crypto
Most crypto enthusiasts are less than pleased with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s past approach to crypto. This is not because legitimate businesses oppose regulation but because of the breadth, complexity and uncertainty associated with the current regulatory regime. Even in the context of general discontent, few actions by the SEC have engendered as much widespread criticism as the Dec. 22, 2020 complaint that initiated a civil enforcement action against Ripple Labs and two of its executives. Not everyone opposed the action. For example, Coin Center, a pro-crypto nonprofit advocacy and research group, declined to argue against the …
Technology / July 21, 2021
SEC vs. Kik Interactive: A status update on the Kin ecosystem and Kin tokens
Much has been written about the Sept. 30, 2020, decision by Judge Alvin Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Kik Interactive. In that order, the judge ruled in favor of the SEC’s motion for summary judgement, applying the Howey Test in the course of determining that Kik Interactive had violated the federal securities laws by selling contractual rights to acquire Kin tokens and later by issuing and selling the Kin tokens themselves. Less has been said about the actual final judgement, entered by the court on Oct. 21, 2020, pursuant …
Technology / Jan. 24, 2021
You Can’t Separate Utility from Security Tokens, Say EU Researchers
European researchers writing for the Oxford University Faculty of Law blog argue that the distinction between utility and security tokens is less important than most assume when it comes to regulation. In a Feb. 3 blog post and their paper, “Blockchain Startups and Prospectus Regulation,” Dmitri Boreiko, Paolo Giudici and Guido Ferrarini claim that the conceptual difference between the two types of crypto-assets “should be at least partially abandoned.” Dmitri Boreiko is an assistant professor of corporate finance and the Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, where Paolo Giudici is a professor of business law. Guido Ferrarini, for his part, is emeritus …
Regulation / Feb. 3, 2020
US SEC Chairman Jay Clayton Confirms ETH Is Not a Security
United States Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton confirmed that Ethereum (ETH) and cryptocurrencies like it aren’t securities under U.S. law, non-profit crypto research organization Coin Center reports on March 12. Citing a letter written by Clayton, Coin Center reports that the SEC staff has found that ETH is not a security under U.S. law. In September last year, Coin Center worked with U.S. representative Ted Budd to send a co-signed letter to Clayton asking whether he agreed with the approach to ETH of the SEC’s director of corporate finance, William Hinman. As Cointelegraph reported in June last …
United States / March 12, 2019
US Lawmakers Want to Brand Libra a Security, Association Disagrees
A couple of United States lawmakers are looking to classify stablecoins as securities. With Libra considering adopting fiat-pegged stablecoins rather than a single token supported by a basket of national currencies, the proposed crypto project might be facing yet another regulatory hurdle. Meanwhile, lawmakers sponsoring the bill say stablecoins should be classified as securities to protect U.S. consumers. If passed, stablecoin projects like Libra will potentially fall under the purview of stringent U.S. securities regulations. Critics of the move remark that such measures only serve to further dampen the country’s position in the emerging digital landscape. Some commentators have long …
United States / Dec. 1, 2019