How Crypto Twitter reacted to Kim Kardashian’s $1.26M SEC fine

Published at: Oct. 4, 2022

The crypto community reacted with a mix of disbelief and amusement after reality star Kim Kardashian was fined for promoting the cryptocurrency EthereumMax (EMAX). 

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined Kardashian $1.26 million on Oct. 3, for “touting on social media” about the EMAX without disclosing she was paid $250,000 to post about it.

Kardashian has neither admitted to nor denied the SEC’s allegations, but settled the charges and agreed to not promote any cryptocurrency assets until 2025.

SEC chairman Gary Gensler tweeted the fine was a reminder that celebrity endorsement of investment opportunities doesn't “mean those investment products are right for all investors.”

Today @SECGov, we charged Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting a crypto security.This case is a reminder that, when celebrities / influencers endorse investment opps, including crypto asset securities, it doesn’t mean those investment products are right for all investors.

— Gary Gensler (@GaryGensler) October 3, 2022

Following Gensler’s tweet, the online crypto community expressed their thoughts on the fine, with some calling out the SEC for its inconsistent enforcement decisions. 

Economist Peter Schiff, known for his anti-Bitcoin (BTC) stance, pointed out what he perceived was an unfair targeting of Kardashian as the SEC hasn’t fined MicroStrategy co-founder Michael Saylor who he believes has “more to gain pumping crypto.”

The SEC is fining @KimKardashian $1.2 million for pumping #crypto. What about the real pumpers? @Saylor had much more to gain pumping crypto than Kim. Or @CNBC paid millions for ads by crypto companies, then pumping #Bitcoin non-stop while providing industry pumpers with airtime?

— Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) October 3, 2022

Saylor responded saying Bitcoin isn’t a security but a commodity and its promotion would be “similar to promoting steel…or granite” and the coin's open protocol offers “utilitarian beliefs similar to roads.”

Crypto-personality and author Layah Heilpern shared she believed “the SEC has bigger issues closer to home it should probably focus on…” likely inferring the widely held belief in the community that certain U.S. politicians have inside traded.

The SEC will go after Kim Kardashian for shilling a crypto but not Nancy Pelosi for insider trading her way to a hundred million dollars https://t.co/i0bZKjaxjJ

— Dr. Parik Patel, BA, CFA, ACCA Esq. (@ParikPatelCFA) October 3, 2022

Pseudonymous developer 0xBender noted a contrast between the SEC’s heavy-handed treatment of crypto promotions from celebrities, while crypto-centric influencers “have been out here shilling you garbage for 0.2 ETH (Ethereum) a tweet.”

The SEC is charging Kim Kardashian with unlawfully promoting a crypto security while influencers have been out here shilling you garbage for 0.2 ETH a tweet

— bender (@0xBender) October 3, 2022

Others such as former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti said influencers thinking to endorse cryptocurrencies should “take note” as the regulator is showing it will “aggressively pursue enforcement actions” and those who promote crypto without considering the laws will “need to find a good lawyer.”

Kim Kardashian presented a very tempting target for the SEC.Because of this case, millions of people who didn’t know much about the SEC now know about it.As an aspiring lawyer, she had every incentive to cooperate. Other celebrity crypto endorsers should take note. https://t.co/3mvMNQOxvg

— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) October 3, 2022

Meanwhile, Ethereum educator and investor Anthony Sassano told his followers he believes the SEC targeted Kardashian because it creates the illusion the regulator is “doing something” about crypto scams, and suggested it should've targeted the creators of EMAX instead.

They went after Kim Kardashian because she makes a good headline and it shows the public that the SEC is "doing something" about crypto scamsIn reality, the fine she paid is dust to her, the creators of Ethereum Max haven't been fined (yet?), and the victims are all still rekt

— sassal.eth (@sassal0x) October 3, 2022

Related: The SEC is bullying Kim Kardashian, and it could chill the influencer economy

Still, some saw the lighter side of investing in a tumultuous and highly speculative crypto token, with journalist Tyler Conway saying the star “got the full crypto experience” by losing more money than she’d been paid.

Self-described hacker and tech content creator Marcus Hutchins said Kardashian “would have gotten better returns” in EthereumMax as it’s down 97% since her post, compared to the -80% the promotion returned for her.

Kim Kardashian got paid $250k to promote Ethereum Max then lost $1.3m of that to an SEC fine. Would have gotten better returns just investing in Ethereum MAX, which is down 97% since her post.

— Marcus Hutchins (@MalwareTechBlog) October 3, 2022
Tags
Regulation
United States
Sec
Twitter
Security
Fines
Related Posts
Getting rid of crypto staking would be a 'terrible path' for the US — Coinbase CEO
The CEO and co-founder of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, believes that banning retail crypto staking in the United States would be a ‘terrible’ move by the country's regulators. Armstrong made the comments in a Feb. 9 Twitter thread which has already been viewed over 2.2 million times, after noting they've heard “rumors” that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission “would like to get rid of crypto staking” for retail customers. “I hope that's not the case as I believe it would be a terrible path for the U.S. if that was allowed to happen.” Armstrong did not share where …
Regulation / Feb. 9, 2023
Crypto lawyers flame Gensler over claims that all crypto are securities
Cryptocurrency lawyers have rebuffed comments made by the head of the United States securities regulator, claiming in a recent interview that every cryptocurrency except Bitcoin (BTC) is a security that falls under its jurisdiction. In a wide-ranging Feb. 23 New York Magazine interview discussing crypto, the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Gary Gensler, claimed “everything other than Bitcoin” falls under the agency’s remit. He added other crypto projects “are securities because there’s a group in the middle and the public is anticipating profits based on that group” which he said is not the case with Bitcoin. Gensler …
Regulation / Feb. 27, 2023
XRP purchasers back Ripple, arguing that it is not a security
On Dec. 22, 2020, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Ripple Labs. The complaint essentially alleged that Ripple had engaged in a multi-year, sustained practice of illegally selling unregistered, non-exempt securities in the form of its XRP tokens. This complaint, having been filed on the last day of former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton’s tenure at the commission, led to a considerable volume of public commentary, as is not unusual for SEC litigation against major players in the crypto space. What is unusual about SEC versus Ripple is the reaction from a sizable segment of XRP …
Technology / March 21, 2021
SEC’s Cryptomom Peirce Believes US Capital Markets Can ‘Transform People’s Lives’
In a July 7 fireside chat courtesy of Unitize, Commissioner Hester Peirce of the Securities and Exchange Commission continued to advocate for regulatory clarity for crypto as a means of opening up capital markets to innovation. Innovation and regulation “I believe in the power of our capital markets to transform people’s lives,” said Peirce. “I wanted to make sure that our regulatory structure was flexible enough to accommodate innovation.” She noted that the the size of the U.S. economy makes its regulations critical to global fundraising: “The race to the bottom is something we should be concerned about. But that’s …
Regulation / July 7, 2020
SEC files objection to Binance US bid for Voyager assets
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has objected to Binance.US’ move to acquire over $1 billion of assets belonging to the defunct cryptocurrency lending firm Voyager Digital. According to a Feb. 22 filing submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, the SEC believes that certain elements of the asset restructuring plan of Binance.US’ acquisition could breach Securities Laws. The SEC is formally investigating whether Binance.US and related debtors violated anti-fraud, registration and other provisions of the federal securities laws. The SEC noted particular concern around the security of assets through the planned …
Regulation / Feb. 23, 2023