Cryptocurrency Regulation in the International Community 2015: Part 1

Published at: April 11, 2015

 

Cointelegraph has assembled a research report on the regulatory environment for cryptocurrency across the globe. Already in 2015, we have seen many attempts at regulating new forms of digital currencies by various governments and jurisdictions, and we’d like to highlight the general trends and outlook for the readers.

The report will be published in two parts, with the first available below relating to the history and the current regulatory status around the world for 2015.

SummaryA visual history of cryptocurrency regulationThe status of cryptocurrency regulation around the worldRegulatory compliance for businessBitLicense: a test case for cryptocurrency regulationCryptocurrency and consumer protectionConclusion: a note on regulation and the future

1. Summary

Bitcoin and cryptocurrency have experienced a rapid evolution of public image over the past three years. From occupying an obscure niche in technology-oriented circles to becoming a major feature of global financial debate, their rise has in many ways been unprecedented.

This rapid transformation has resulted in, and in turn been precipitated by, an explosion in associated socioeconomic activity. Businesses with countless focuses have appeared in order to profit from and innovative on the potential held by Bitcoin and its associated blockchain technology.  In fact, an entire ecosystem has taken root, which can be found in the majority of the world’s jurisdictions that has collectively come to be known as the cryptocurrency community.

The practical implementation of cryptocurrency to the point where a certain number of members of this community, as well as lay consumers are using it to transact, has placed it firmly on the radar of international lawmakers. While this in itself is hardly a surprising development, the methods in which jurisdictions are treating cryptocurrency, as well as their overall perspective and degree of permissiveness, vary considerably. In many countries, there are still no clear rules dealing with cryptocurrency at all.

This variability is not simply a reflection of the political situation in respective states; rather, it is seen as a consequence of the challenging nature of cryptocurrency itself. Blockchain technology and the many ways in which it manifests itself in practice create a complex new area for legislators, and the difficulty of regulating cryptocurrency is conspicuous in the fact that, for example, no jurisdiction has so far managed to produce an entirely effective solution.

The challenges presented by cryptocurrency have furthermore been linked by skeptics, sometimes arguably excessively, to illicit activity. A popular belief in March 2015 is that cryptocurrency more easily facilitates achieving of illicit goals by criminals and other bad actors, and even that cryptocurrency by its very nature is somehow bound to heighten criminal activity. While it cannot be said that this is a definitive factor in deciding how policy makers legislate, it is certainly a common argument put forward in government literature on cryptocurrency, as any scan of news resources will confirm.

It is safe to suggest that in considering the concept of effective regulation of cryptocurrency, lawmakers must take into consideration a wealth of factors concerning both consumers and businesses.

The report below considers a number of these factors and provides some background information for perspective on the issue, as well as more in-depth opinion from a range of experts in the field. Long-time Cointelegraph collaborator Tone Vays also offers his contribution on several important topics, which can be found in the respective sections.

2. A visual history of cryptocurrency regulation

The infographic below gives a brief outline of the major events to have occurred within the sphere of cryptocurrency regulation internationally, from the first noteworthy incident in Germany in August 2013 to Russia’s announcement of penalties for the use of ‘money surrogates’ in October 2014.

3. The status of cryptocurrency regulation around the world

The main objective seemingly desired by both regulators and the cryptocurrency community with regard to regulation is to strike an effective balance. This ‘balance’ more specifically consists of allowing for essential mechanisms related to areas such as tax and consumer protection to be applied to cryptocurrencies, while at the same time allowing for innovation within the community to continue unimpeded.

As of March 2015, it is immediately apparent from consulting any relevant analytical material that this balance has not been achieved in any major jurisdiction, and far less so internationally. The infographic below gives an outline of current regulatory practices across the world.

For more detailed information on specific areas, refer to the expert comments included following the infographic. Included are statements relating to positive, negative and contested jurisdictions to give an overall impression of the challenges facing cryptocurrency in each scenario.

Sources: Cointelegraph, Blockchain.info, CoinDesk, European Digital Currency and Blockchain Forum, CoinOutlet, Coinmap.org, CoinATMRadar, Bitcoinpulse. All pages accessed 9 – 25 March 2015.

Did you enjoy this article? You may also be interested in reading these ones:

Bitcoin Review 2014 Part II: VC Investment and Regulatory EnvironmentBitcoin Review 2014 Part I: Price and Commercial Activity
Tags
Related Posts
FTX crypto exchange expands to Bahamas with new registration
FTX, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, continues expanding operations by inking major regulatory approval in The Bahamas. The Securities Commission of The Bahamas has registered FTX Digital Markets, the Bahamian subsidiary of the global FTX crypto exchange, as an official digital asset business, the firm announced Sept. 20. The regulatory approval is granted under the Digital Asset Registered Bill of The Bahamas, the country’s new digital asset-related legislation that came into force in late 2020. Also known as the DARE Act, the legislation establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital asset operations in The Bahamas, regulating and supervising …
Adoption / Sept. 20, 2021
What the SEC can learn from the German regulator
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s chairperson Gary Gensler announced this month that the crypto industry should not escape the purview of the regulator. He highlighted that decentralized finance (DeFi) trading and lending protocols need particular attention when it comes to investor protections. Regulation can extend into a menu of options that covers custody, reporting, counterparty verification and asset classification and issuance. Reports are surfacing that people are waiting with bated breath on how the SEC will regulate the DeFi industry, but Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, also known as BaFin, has found a way to apply existing securities …
Technology / Aug. 12, 2021
Our Man in Shanghai: Huobi to become Grayscale of Asia, Yao Ming’s NFT wine and more ...
This weekly roundup of news from Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong attempts to curate the industry’s most important news, including influential projects, changes in the regulatory landscape, and enterprise blockchain integrations. Huobi Asset Management is looking to be the Grayscale of Asia with the launch of four cryptocurrency-related tracker funds. The funds include a Bitcoin Fund, an Ethereum fund, a multi-asset basket of digital currencies, and a private equity fund for mining businesses. The aim is clearly to entice major institutional investors into the space with a product that feels familiar. The fund and asset management company is set …
Technology / April 30, 2021
California Public Accountants Seek Clarity on Cryptocurrency Holdings
The California Society of Certified Public Accountants (CalCPA) is seeking clarity on cryptocurrency holdings from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), according to a recent letter obtained by Cointelegraph. In the letter, CalCPA stated that accounting for digital currencies is not adequately captured under existing United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) established by the FASB, and should be generally aligned with the accounting model for a foreign currency. The organization said that many of the features and risks of cryptocurrencies are similar to those of foreign currency. The society further argued: “...while no government backs cryptocurrencies, the ‘gold standard’ …
Bitcoin / June 5, 2019
Total crypto market cap falls to $840 billion, but derivatives data shows traders are neutral
The total cryptocurrency market capitalization dropped 1.5% in the past seven days to rest at $840 billion. The slightly negative movement did not break the ascending channel initiated on Nov. 12, although the overall sentiment remains bearish and year-to-date losses amount to 64%. Bitcoin (BTC) price dropped 0.8% on the week, stabilizing near the $16,800 level at 10:00 UTC on Dec. 8 — even though it eventually broke above $17,200 later on the day. Discussions related to regulating crypto markets pressured markets and the FTX exchange collapse limited traders' appetites, causing lawmakers to turn their attention to the potential impact …
Bitcoin / Dec. 8, 2022