What Makes DeFi Decentralized? Rune Christensen on Centralized Collateral and Decentralizing Make

Published at: April 7, 2020

As part of its Black Thursday mitigation efforts, MakerDAO introduced USDC as a form of collateral. While this was an emergency measure, it touched the very sensitive topic of centralized collateral assets in Maker (MKR).

The concept of decentralization underpins the entire existence of crypto, serving as a core ideology. Historically, decentralization has clashed with the need to be pragmatic in creating useful products.

An example of that is the 2016 DAO hack that led to the split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic. The controversy swung between the idealistic concept of “code is law” and the pragmatic realization that code can be faulty — and that the consequences of those faults should be corrected.

The complex interaction between decentralization and pragmatism entered a whole new dimension in decentralized finance (DeFi). The actions of the Maker community in response to Black Thursday best exemplify this interaction, as the debates often centered on whether it was “right” to add centralized collateral or repay the victims of the crash.

Pragmatism seems to be winning in the community, for now. But Cointelegraph’s interview with Rune Christensen showed that his own ideas are also a complex amalgam of ideology and pragmatism.

For one, he has traditionally favored the idea of relying on centralized collateral to support the decentralized DAI stablecoin.

The case for centrally-tokenized assets

Cointelegraph asked Christensen why he is so supportive of adding centralized collateral to DAI. He prefaced his answer by saying:

“What matters in this discussion is that Maker protocol, and DeFi in general, is about creating real value and real use, in the real world. It's not the ideology that's the most important.”

In his view, choosing good collateral is all about risk management, and both centralized and decentralized assets can present risk.

For centralized assets such as the USDC stablecoin, their issuer has the right to freeze funds — which if done on Maker collateral would instantly destabilize the system. In addition, the issuer of that asset could fail in a variety of ways and bring down the token’s peg with it.

But Christensen believes that decentralized assets have risks of their own, namely their volatility. He summarized his thoughts:

“There’s Ethereum and then there’s a centralized stablecoin, or generally, speculative crypto versus tokenized fiat. It’s almost like they’re at completely opposite ends of the risk spectrum. So the two types of assets actually complement each other quite well.”

He added that relying on just one stablecoin is not ideal, but “spreading out that risk across five different stablecoins” would be an “obvious next step.”

In any case, Christensen stressed that the responsibility rests with the Maker community:

“It is the MKR holders that make this type of decision, with this alignment of incentives that if they make the wrong decision and take a big risk [...] the MKR holders have to pay for the loss.”

This type of thinking showcases some of Christensen’s ideological side.

The complex journey of decentralizing Maker

Some may be surprised to discover that Maker was born in late 2014, well before even Ethereum’s launch in July 2015. Christensen recalled those times:

“From the very beginning of the project, I naively thought that all I would need to do is to write the white paper, and then I could just leave it to the decentralized community to take care of.”

He noted that the project was initially “incredibly decentralized” as it was him and a few co-founders working on it. But that approach didn’t work, and the foundation was born to direct the development of the project. He added:

“Over the years I kept running into it [...] My ideology and my hope for how DeFi and blockchain would play out kept crashing into reality. It turns out actually you do, quite often, need someone to make the tough decisions and make sure of things.”

On April 3 — shortly before the interview — the Maker Foundation announced its concrete plan to dissolve itself as MakerDAO reaches full decentralization.

It is perhaps not a coincidence that Christensen stayed out of the community’s decision-making after Black Thursday. While he did not admit this directly, the timing of these events suggests that, at least in part, he was testing the community — to see if it could make the “tough decisions” on its own.

It appears that the community passed it with flying colors, and it will be rewarded with all the resources necessary to continue development of Maker. Speaking about his own role at the end of the journey, he said:

“When the day comes, when I'm just not that useful anymore […] That's something I'm going to be very happy about.”

Tags
Related Posts
'Privacy-preserving computing is the future,' says Secret Network's Guy Zyskind after Quentin Tarantino NFT drop
On Nov. 2, award-winning writer and director Quentin Tarantino announced he would auction off seven uncut scenes from Pulp Fiction as nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, built on the Secret Network (SCRT). The digitized assets will include the first uncut scripts of the movie, as well as secrets about the film and its creators. While the NFTs will feature public metadata, acting as a sort of front cover of the underlying digitized asset, only the NFT owner will have access to the never before seen content — a unique feature of the Secret Network. Regarding the drop, Tarantino said "Secret Network …
Decentralization / Nov. 4, 2021
'We'll see about 200 chains connected through Cosmos' IBC next year', says Tendermint CEO Peng Zhong
Ever since the launch of the inter-blockchain communications, or IBC, protocol in March, which enabled the communication and transfer of digital assets across different blockchains, development activity seems to have picked up pace on the Cosmos (ATOM) network. Transaction volumes, the creation of decentralized applications, and the number of chains connected via IBC have all been trending upwards in recent months. Speakers at the Cosmoverse Conference, which took place last week, presented many of the latest technologies under development on the blockchain. Its biggest-ever hackathon will also take place in Lisbon tomorrow. #HackAtomVI is trending in the dev community! 1000+ …
Decentralization / Nov. 10, 2021
Ether already ‘flippening’ Bitcoin, says Celsius CEO
Bitcoin (BTC), the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, has already started losing its market dominance to Ether (ETH), according to Celsius Network CEO Alex Mashinsky. In a Monday interview with Kitco News, Mashinsky argued that the Ether “flippening,” or the hypothetical scenario in which Ether overtakes Bitcoin as the world’s most valued cryptocurrency, is already happening right now. Mashinsky said that the flippening has already happened on Celsius. “We manage about $17 billion in deposits, or in customer coins, and the number one coin held in dollar terms is Ethereum,” he said. Mashinsky also predicted that Ether will have completely …
Decentralization / July 6, 2021
Monero, Kyber Network and Tornado Cash break out as traders pile into privacy protocols
Stocks and cryptocurrencies saw a notable bounce on March 9 even though war, rising inflation and historically high oil prices have investors uncertain about the future. Bitcoin (BTC) price surged to $42,600 in the early trading hours and several altcoins followed suit with double-digit gains. Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows that the biggest gainers over the past 24-hours were Monero (XMR), Kyber Network (KNC) and Tornado Cash (TORN), with Zcash (ZEC) earning an honorable mention. Monero Monero is one of the longest-running privacy-focused protocols in the cryptocurrency market and the project is popular among investors looking to …
Decentralization / March 9, 2022
Terra 2.0: A crypto project built on the ruins of $40 billion in investors' money
Terra remained the focus of the majority of headlines throughout May for its spiral collapse leading to a loss of over $40 billion in investors’ money. Despite some early resistance from the community and heavy backlash from the likes of Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, Terra co-founder Do Kwon managed to relaunch the collapsed network with a new chain called Terra 2.0 (Phoenix-1). The amended proposal for the relaunch of the network by increasing the genesis liquidity, which introduces a new liquidity profile for pre-attack Luna Classic (LUNC) holders and decreases the distribution to post-attack TerraUSD Classic (USTC) holders, was …
Decentralization / June 3, 2022