‘US Government does not stand for freedom’: Bukele reacts to US bill passing Senate committee

Published at: March 24, 2022

El Salvador president Nayib Bukele reacted to the news that the recently proposed Accountability for Cryptocurrency in El Salvador Act (ACES) had passed the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and will now head to a full Senate vote. The 40-year old national leader responded emotionally on Twitter:

Never in my wildest dreams would I have thought that the US Government would be afraid of what we are doing here. pic.twitter.com/QgJPa70mn0

— Nayib Bukele (@nayibbukele) March 23, 2022

On Wednesday, March 23, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved the bill, sponsored by Senators James Risch, Bill Cassidy, and Bob Menendez. The Committee granted a pass to S. 3666 (ACES) bill that is supposed to “mitigate risks related to El Salvador’s adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender”, and to S. 816, “legislation to recalibrate the State Department’s risk tolerance abroad”.

Related: El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law: Understanding alternatives to government intervention

The ACES was first introduced on Feb. 16, 2022. In case securing the approval of the full Senate, it will require the federal government to assess the enactment of Bitcoin law in El Salvador and determine whether the nation can “mitigate the financial integrity and cyber security risks” and meet Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements. After 60 days of assessment, the agencies should come up with action plans.

Immediately after the introduction of the ACES in February, Bukele demanded that the U.S. “stay out” of El Salvador’s domestic affairs. “The US Government DOES NOT stand for freedom and that is a proven fact”, — Salvadoran leader claimed this time.

The date of the ACES vote in the U.S. Senate is yet to be determined.

Tags
Law
Related Posts
Crypto, Congress and the Commission: What’s next for the ‘Wild West’?
The entire cryptocurrency industry is waking up to a new reality. Politicians and regulators have decided to wade into the space, which had flown mainly under their radar until now. A House committee chair is launching a working group; the Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking new authorities to regulate digital assets as securities; and the Senate-passed infrastructure bill includes $28 billion in tax revenues from crypto transactions. This last handful of weeks has arguably seen more regulatory activity around digital currencies since the name Satoshi Nakamoto first entered the popular lexicon. Anyone whose business deals in this asset class …
Bitcoin / Aug. 28, 2021
U.S. Congressman calls for ‘Broad, bipartisan consensus’ on important issues of digital asset policy
In a letter to the leadership of the United States House Financial Services Committee, ranking member Patrick McHenry took a jab at “inconsistent treatment and jurisdictional uncertainty” inherent in U.S. crypto regulation and called for the Committee to take on its critical issues. McHenry, a Republican representing North Carolina, opened by mentioning that the Committee’s Democrat Chairwoman Maxine Waters is looking to schedule additional hearings addressing matters pertinent to the digital asset industry. He further stressed the need for identifying and prioritizing the key issues and achieving a “broad, bipartisan consensus” on the matters affecting the industry that holds immense …
Regulation / Jan. 25, 2022
Law Decoded: States’ crypto rights and the influx of digital money into analog politics, Feb. 7–14.
Several storylines that had been long in the making dominated last week’s news cycle in the cryptocurrency policy and enforcement department. The Russian government has made another huge step on the path toward creating a tailored regulatory framework for digital assets, unveiling its consolidated view that crypto is to be treated as currency rather than swept under the rug of a blanket ban. While this movement in the direction of crypto’s formal legitimization is a welcomed development, a host of questions persists related to both the exact shape of the new regime and its enforcement. The biggest enforcement story of …
Regulation / Feb. 14, 2022
Crypto’s regulatory fate will be decided in the year ahead
It would be ideal for the industry for Congress to weigh in on its fate rather than leaving it to unelected regulators at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). To that end, representatives from both sides of the aisle have introduced bills designed to offer “regulatory clarity.” The moderate position seems to favor placing crypto mostly under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). To be sure, there are two Senate bills in particular that are not ideal. Boozman-Stabenow lacks clarity Democratic Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow has coauthored one proposal with Republican Sen. John Boozman. With …
Regulation / Dec. 19, 2022
Anonymous crypto developers belong in prison — and will be there soon
In the months following the announcement of my company’s first experimental title, Cyberstella, visits to my personal LinkedIn profile increased by an astonishing 300%. What does this tell us about the rising trend of anonymous developers popping up in every Web3 community to spam users with investment opportunities and then disappear from the face of the Earth? Well, it spells out trouble for anonymous crypto developers who think they can get away with never putting their face where the money is, so to speak. The fundamental principle behind crypto investing is a two-step process: Issue your project’s native token, leverage …
Regulation / Dec. 14, 2022