Telegram drops lawsuit over ‘GRAM’ trademark, but must cover legal fees

Published at: Aug. 26, 2020

Telegram Messenger Inc has voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against Lantah LLC over the use of the ‘GRAM’ trademark for its cryptocurrency token of the same name.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that Telegram will have to pay reasonable attorney fees to Lantah for defending the lawsuit since 2018. 

As Lantah has not submitted records documenting its legal costs, the parties must now negotiate a reasonable sum before reconvening with the court.

The judge dismissed the suit without prejudice to refiling, allowing Telegram to make claims over the GRAM trademark in the future and rejecting Lantah’s request for dismissal with prejudice.

Telegram dropped the lawsuit after abandoning its Telegram Open Network project in May and settling with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in June.

While Telegram announced its plans to fund the launch of a blockchain network through the sale of GRAM tokens in late-December 2017, the Florida-based Lantah had formed in June 2017 and claimed to have already planned to issue a cryptocurrency called GRAM before Telegram.

Despite Lantah submitting an application for the GRAM trademark by 2018, Telegram took legal action against the firm in May 2018 after raising $1.7 billion through a three-month offering of GRAM tokens.

Lantah filed counterclaims in June 2018, asserting that it had priority over the trademark. However, the court would grant Telegram’s request for a preliminary injunction barring Lantah from using the trademark, noting that Telegram had begun using the trademark within a commercial context before Lantah.

Tags
Business
Tokens
Law
Telegram
Related Posts
SEC vs. Telegram: Part 1 — Key takeaways for now
Telegram is a popular, global, cloud-based instant messaging, videotelephone and voice-over service company. Particularly popular with crypto-enthusiasts, at the end of 2017, Telegram came up with a plan to raise funds to support the development of a new crypto asset, dubbed Gram, and a network originally planned as the Telegraph Open Network. Proceeds would also fund further expansion of the messaging service that had previously been funded by the founders. Telegram set out to fundraise in two distinct stages. The first involved the sale of contractual rights to acquire Grams if and when they were successfully launched. The second stage …
Technology / Sept. 21, 2020
SEC vs. Telegram: Part 2 — The case against integrating the two prongs of a SAFT
As discussed in the previous article, Telegram is a popular global instant messaging company. In 2018, it sold contractual rights to acquire a new crypto asset that it was developing (to be called Grams) to a group of accredited (and wealthy) investors around the world. Telegram raised about $1.7 billion from 171 investors, including 39 U.S. purchasers. This was a prelude to the planned launch of Grams, which was to occur about a year and a half later in October 2019. This two-step process — where a crypto entrepreneur sells contractual rights to acquire a crypto asset upon launch in …
Technology / Sept. 22, 2020
Crypto inheritance: Are HODLers doomed to rely on centralized options?
Self-sovereignty is a core principle in the cryptocurrency space: Investors need to rely on a trustless, decentralized network instead of a central entity that has been known to devalue the holdings of others. One shortcoming associated with self-sovereignty, however, is inheritance. An estimated 4 million Bitcoin (BTC) has been lost over time and now sits in inaccessible wallets. How many of those coins belong to HODLers who passed away without sharing access to their wallets with anyone else is unknown? Some believe Satoshi Nakamoto’s estimated 1 million BTC fortune hasn’t been touched for this very reason: No one else had …
Adoption / May 23, 2022
Ideas vs. practice: How are regulators working together on crypto?
The regulation of cryptocurrencies across the world is a constant battle for investors in a rapidly expanding and constantly changing ecosystem. Various regulatory agencies around the world view digital assets in a different light that vary significantly from one another. Recently, executive board member of the European Central Bank (ECB) Fabio Panetta mentioned in a written statement for a speech to Columbia University that regulators should follow a globally coordinated approach while regulating digital assets. He said that the world should have digital assets regulated by the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) rules of the …
Decentralization / May 25, 2022
Tether requests Roche Freedman to be booted from class action
USDT-issuer Tether wants law firm Roche Freedman “terminated” as counsel from the Bitfinex and Tether class action lawsuit following a motion from Kyle Roche to be removed as counsel in the case. In an Aug. 31 court order request by Elliot Greenfield of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, the law firm representing Tether and Bitfinex requested that Roche’s law firm be removed from the case entirely and to certify that they’ve returned or destroyed all defendant-issued documents and have not shared them with any third-party, including Ava Labs. The request follows shortly after Roche submitted a Notice of Motion to Withdraw …
Blockchain / Sept. 2, 2022