Bidders Pay Up to 24% Less for MKR in Phase Two of MakerDAO Auction

Published at: March 23, 2020

As the first MakerDAO debt auction draws to a close, March 23, a total of $4.3 million worth of undercollateralized Dai (DAI) has been bid across both phases, and will be burned.

But those bidders who waited for the second phase bagged the best deals, with some winners paying 24% less per Maker (MKR) token than the highest bidders in phase one.

Bargains to be had in the second phase of the auction

Opening offers on each of the 86 total lots were to receive 250 Maker tokens for fixed bids of 50,000 Dai. Subsequent bids then reduced the amount of MKR received, with the minimum reduction of 3% of the existing bid.

During the period of the first auction, MKR price went up from its initial level of around $265 to spike at over $300. This led to the automated auction-keeper bots placing bids for increasingly lower amounts of Maker.

Thirty-three of the 40 lots released in phase one were won with bids of 188.68 MKR, representing an equivalent token price of $265.00. However, the seven lots won with the highest bids, sold at a token price of $289.57.

In contrast, 50% of the 46 lots released in phase two were won with bids of $220.00 per Maker token, representing a 24% saving over the highest price paid in phase one.

A further 12 lots were won with bids equivalent to $226.60 per token, and another seven with bids of $233.64. Two of the lots were won with early low bids of around $250 per token, and two lots are outstanding at the time of publishing.

MKR price had dropped back to $265 by the start of phase two of the auction, and has since continued to fall to $245.

More unique bidders in phase two

As Cointelegraph reported, 33 of the 40 lots auctioned in phase one were won by just three bidders, leading to accusations that the Maker Foundation had taken part in the auction itself.

The Maker Foundation refuted these claims, explaining that it had simply offered limited technical assistance to help some bidders participate in the auctions. It stressed that this assistance, “in no way provides informational or any other advantage to those bidders.”

While the second phase of the auction has certainly seen some heavyweight bidders trying to win multiple lots, there have also been smaller bidders. According to stats logged by Dune Analytics, phase two has seen 30 unique bidders, as opposed to 25 in the first phase.

Whoever wins the tokens, the debt auction mechanism has been shown to function as intended. It was designed to deal with shortfalls in collateral for total Dai issued through the Maker Protocol, and has managed to raise $4.3 million in the wake of the recent Ether (ETH) market crash.

Even those who paid the most for their Maker tokens have still got a bargain in relation to the longer-term price. In the year-to-date prior to the crash which triggered the auction, MKR traded at an average price of around $550.

Tags
Related Posts
Chicago DeFi Alliance Launches to Save Decentralized Finance
Amid the apparent ongoing collapse in decentralized finance (DeFi) lending, a group of major trading and cryptocurrency companies in the United States are launching an alliance to support the sector. Introduced on April 7, the Chicago DeFi Alliance (CDA) aims to provide DeFi-focused startups and entrepreneurs with support and guidance in complying with trading regulations and other applicable requirements. Chicago DeFi Alliance to share its expertise to boost DeFi liquidity and markets According to a blog post by crypto fund Volt Capital, a founding member the CDA initiative, the alliance also includes major brokerage firm TD Ameritrade, crypto investment firms …
Decentralization / April 8, 2020
Was 2020 a ‘DeFi year,’ and what is expected from the sector in 2021? Experts answer
Figuring out the point at which decentralized finance began almost always ends up in a rhetorical debate. Some argue that Bitcoin’s (BTC) invention a decade ago marked the start of it, as the major cryptocurrency was the first peer-to-peer digital money and represents the conceptual core underpinning DeFi. Others say — and would be technically correct in doing so — that DeFi started back in December 2017, when Ethereum-based protocol MakerDAO was launched, followed by Compound Finance and Uniswap, released in September and November 2018, respectively. On the other hand, it wouldn’t be a stretch to say that DeFi’s true …
Decentralization / Dec. 23, 2020
Report: ICO Fundraising Plummeted 95% Year-Over-Year in 2019
A report published by research firm CB Insights has found that equity funding has dramatically overtaken initial coin offerings (ICOs) as the dominant means of finance in the blockchain space. While the largely unregulated ICO boom of 2018 raised $7.8 billion, initial coin offering funding fell more than 95% to raise $371 million in 2019. By contrast, equity funding raised $2.8 billion last year. The report also notes the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi), noting that there are currently more than $1 billion in assets on DeFi platforms — up from $300 million as of January 2019. Crypto firms are …
Decentralization / March 23, 2020
Fireblocks to ‘Bridge the Gap’ Between Institutional Traders and DeFi
Institutional digital asset security platform Fireblocks has announced an integration with decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platform Compound — currently the second-largest application built on Ethereum. Entities storing assets with Fireblocks can now generate passive income by accessing Compound — an algorithmic interest rate protocol currently managing $163 million in interest-earning digital assets including cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. The partnership will allow institutions like market makers, hedge funds and exchanges to put assets on Compound. Fireblocks to make things easier for institutions Speaking to Cointelegraph, Compound CEO Robert Leshner explained that the partnership with Fireblocks will make it easier for institutional entities …
Decentralization / March 17, 2020
The battle of banks vs. DeFi is a win for individual crypto investors
The state of banking and finance today presents a complex labyrinth that even seasoned bankers struggle to navigate. Despite appearances, there is a method to this madness. As Nobel Prize winners like Muhammad Yunus and Joseph Stiglitz have cautioned in the past: central banking, in particular, has morphed to keep the status quo in check. Or, in the words of Mike Maloney, an expert on monetary history and economics: It is “the biggest scam in the history of mankind.” Maloney reasons that giving a small group of unelected individuals the keys to the monetary printing press will undoubtedly rot away …
Decentralization / Dec. 19, 2021