Craig Wright Denies Transferring ‘Satoshi’ Coins, Leaving Him in Legal Catch-22

Published at: May 21, 2020

Editor’s note: This story was updated on May 21 to include Craig Wright’s response.

Bitcoin SV’s billionaire benefactor Calvin Ayre was the first to reveal Satoshi claimant Craig Wright denied moving 50 BTC from a long-dormant address thought by some to belong to the Bitcoin founder. 

On Wednesday, an unknown party moved 50 Bitcoin (BTC) ⁠— roughly $486,000 worth — from an address containing coins mined barely one month after the launch of the Bitcoin mainnet in 2009. 

But in a Twitter response to Blockstream’s Adam Back, Ayre said it had nothing to do with Wright. The Satoshi claimant later released his own statement on May 21:

These coins are not my personal coins and I did not move them and as I have mentioned before I have no intent of dumping BTC or otherwise touching trust assets.

Potential perjury? 

The address in question, 17XiVVooLcdCUCMf9s4t4jTExacxwFS5uh, is among 16,430 others in a preliminary list associated with the Kleinman v. Wright case

Wright has denied in court he has access to the private keys to the addresses. If he said he moved the 50 BTC from a wallet in the final submitted list, logically he’d be in trouble. And if someone else moved the coins, that would indicate the address does not belong to him, again leaving him in a potentially sticky legal situation.

But confusing matters, there are three different lists of addresses that have been submitted (as this Reddit post attempts to explain).

Wright released a statement overnight to claim the list filed in August 2019 “was compiled as an exhaustive record of addresses that would most likely incorporate trust holdings” but not submitted to the court as evidence of his Bitcoin holdings. He claims to have submitted a final list on January 14 which reportedly contained only 16,404 addresses. 

That document remains under court-ordered seal, but I can confirm that the address from which yesterday’s transaction originated was not included in the final list that was submitted to the court.

The judge has questioned Wright’s credibility on more than one occasion.

Bitcoin price falls 5%

The movement of 50 BTC from the dormant wallet had many in the crypto community asking whether Nakamoto himself was back. 

The wallet address is not one associated with the Bitcoin creator, but the 11-year gap in activity still caused a 5% drop in BTC price — from the $9,700s to $9,400s — when the news broke.

BTC price falling ~5% after news of Satoshi coin movement

Wright’s denial should stem any fears he’s about to sell off a large amount of Bitcoin. In 2018, he posted an ominous warning on Slack, explaining in detail how he’d be selling a “large volume of BTC” around the time of a halving that would tank the price.

Others in the crypto community, however, are highly skeptical the tokens belong to either Nakamoto or Wright. Blockstream founder Adam Back thinks if the real Satoshi were to liquidate some of his holdings, he would choose a more anonymous address.

Tags
Law
Related Posts
Craig Wright wins default judgment, Bitcoin.org must remove Bitcoin white paper
Self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin SV proponent Craig Wright has won a legal battle claiming copyright infringement on the part of Bitcoin.org for hosting the Bitcoin white paper. Wright won by default after the website’s pseudonymous owner, “Cøbra,” chose not to mount a defense. Bitcoin.org must now remove the white paper and display a notice referring to the judgment and cough up at least 35,000 British pounds ($48,600) to cover Wright’s legal costs. Cøbra responded to the ruling on Twitter: I don't think you could get a better advertisement of *why* Bitcoin is necessary than what happened today. Rules enforced …
Copyrights / June 29, 2021
Craig Wright Already Has Key to Encrypted ‘Satoshi’ File — Kleiman
Ira Kleiman’s legal team claims Dr Craig Wright already has the ability to open the encrypted file believed to contain the private keys to more than 820,000 Bitcoin. The Kleiman estate is suing Wright over the Bitcoin he allegedly mined in a partnership with the late Dave Kleiman. Wright says there was no partnership. According to court documents filed May 21, Kleiman alleges Wright “has the ability to open the encrypted file, but won’t because it will contain evidence of the partnership and its Bitcoin holdings.” Kleiman submitted that $1.6 million in Bitcoin (BTC) had been spent from addresses supplied …
Bitcoin / May 22, 2020
Court Calls on Craig Wright’s Wife to Testify in Ongoing Kleiman Case
Judge Bruce Reinhart, who is overseeing the ongoing Kleiman v. Wright case, has requested international assistance in order to call Ramona Watts, Craig Wright’s wife, to the stand. Judge Reinhart sent his request to the Senior Master of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court in Strand, London, according to a court filing dated July 22. As per the filing, Judge Reinhart sent the request because he believes that the witnesses being called — three in total — have directly relevant evidence pursuant to the case. Regarding Watts, Reinhart wrote that she is being called in order to produce …
Bitcoin / July 25, 2019
Kleiman v. Wright Case Update: Man From Belgium Tells Judge He Is Satoshi
A new person has stepped forward and claimed to be Satoshi Nakomoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin (BTC). Debo Jurgen Etienne Guido made his claim in a letter filed with a federal courthouse in Florida on July 22. Guido addressed his letter to Judge Bruce Reinhart — the judge overseeing the ongoing Kleiman v. Wright case. Guido wrote: “I hereby testify, by written letter — I am the genuine and only originator/creator of the genesis block of the Bitcoin blockchain. I used the handle Satoshi Nakamoto and mail [email protected] to write and publish the whitepaper bitcoin.” The case began back …
Bitcoin / July 24, 2019
Craig Wright Uses Falsified Docs to Prove Innocence in Kleiman Case: Report
Self-proclaimed Bitcoin (BTC) creator Craig Wright has allegedly provided fabricated court documents to prove a trust deed with his plaintiffs, as seen from documents revealed by trial lawyer Stephen Palley on Twitter on July 3. According to Palley, the self-styled Satoshi Nakamoto has failed to prove his case by presenting court documents that Palley alleges to be fake, as they contain multiple chronological discrepancies. Among the exhibits filed with the District Court for the Florida Southern District on July 3, there is a document submitted as proof of cooperation between Wright and the now-deceased David Kleiman, whose lawyers filed the …
Bitcoin / July 4, 2019