US Judge Rules to Bring Alleged Cryptocurrency Scam Under CFTC Oversight

Published at: Sept. 27, 2018

A U.S. federal district judge has ruled that an allegedly fraudulent crypto token meets the definition of a commodity, bringing the case under regulators’ purview, Finance Feeds reports September 27.

Judge Rya W. Zobel of the Massachusetts District Court ruled Sept. 25 against a motion to dismiss a case that had been launched by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against an allegedly fraudulent crypto scheme known as “My Big Coin Pay Inc.,” reported to have been based in the state of Nevada.

The CFTC had sued tech entrepreneur Randall Crater, and other relief defendants tied to his firm, for allegedly violating the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by manipulating investors to buy My Big Coin (MBC) via a series of misleading or false statements. A total of 28 investors are purported to have been defrauded of a collective $6 million, having been led to believe that MBC was “backed by gold” and was being “actively traded” on various crypto exchanges.

The defendants are further alleged to have “arbitrarily” manipulated the value of MBC to dissimulate the price fluctuations of a legitimate cryptocurrency, despite investors purportedly themselves being unable to withdraw funds or trade their MBC token holdings.

Crater’s lawyers had attempted to dismiss the CFTC’s case, arguing that the token escaped the regulator’s enforcement jurisdiction as it was neither a tangible good nor service on which futures contracts are based.

Nonetheless, Judge Zobel ruled in favor of categorizing both MBC and Bitcoin (BTC) — with which Crater had purportedly compared the token — as virtual currencies in which “contracts for future delivery are [...] presently dealt in.” The judge ruled that a “commodity” for the purposes of CEA is broader than any particular type or brand of that commodity, concluding that:

“Here, the amended complaint alleges that My Big Coin is a virtual currency and it is undisputed that there is futures trading in virtual currencies (specifically involving Bitcoin). That is sufficient, especially at the pleading stage, for plaintiff to allege that My Big Coin is a ‘commodity’ under the Act.”

Judge Zobel is reported to have referred to the precedent set by an earlier case from March, in which New York district judge Jack B. Weinstein ruled that the CFTC had the authority to regulate the commercial operations of another, allegedly “bold and vicious” crypto-related fraud from a firm known CabbageTech Corp.

Judge Weinstein’s ruling confirmed the applicability of federal commodity regulations to Bitcoin under the CFTC’s oversight, leading to a successful court order that permanently barred the operations of CabbageTech Corp. this August.

Tags
Related Posts
New York District Judge Rules That CFTC Can Permanently Ban Crypto Firm
The U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has won a court order to permanently bar the operator of the New York-based firm CabbageTech Corp. for cryptocurrency-related “bold and vicious fraud,” Bloomberg reported August 24. Earlier this year, Patrick McDonnell, cryptocurrency promoter and operator of CabbageTech Corp., was charged with “fraud and misappropriation in connection with purchases and trading of Bitcoin (BTC) and Litecoin (LTC).” McDonnell subsequently argued that the CFTC did not have the authority to regulate his commercial operations; however, New York district judge Jack B. Weinstein rejected his claim. In July, Weinstein reportedly held a nonjury trial where …
United States / Aug. 25, 2018
US CFTC Brings Action Against $147 Million Bitcoin Investment Scheme
The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) launched action against a reportedly fraudulent $147 million bitcoin (BTC) scheme, the regulator announced on June 18. On June 17, the CFTC filed a complaint with the New York Southern District Court against now-defunct United Kingdom-based entity Control-Finance Ltd, which defrauded more than 1,000 investors to launder at least 22,858 bitcoin. The CFTC also brings actions against the entity’s head, Benjamin Reynolds, stating that Control-Finance and Reynolds “exploited public enthusiasm for Bitcoin” from May 1, 2017, to October 31, 2017. The action seeks civil monetary penalties, including “permanent trading and registration bans, …
Bitcoin Regulation / June 18, 2019
Bitcoin Hedge Fund and CEO Slapped With $2.5 Million Penalty for Ponzi Scheme
A New York federal court has ordered cryptocurrency hedge fund Gelfman Blueprint, Inc. (GBI) and its CEO Nicholas Gelfman to pay over $2.5 million for operating a fraudulent Ponzi scheme, according to an official announcement published Oct. 18. GBI is a New York-based corporation and denominated Bitcoin (BTC) hedge fund incorporated in 2014. As stated on the company’s website, by 2015 it had 85 customers and 2,367 BTC under management. The order is the continuation of the initial anti-fraud enforcement action filed by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against GBI in September 2017. The CFTC charged GBI for …
Bitcoin / Oct. 19, 2018
CFTC Charges Two Defendants for Defrauding Investors and Impersonation of CFTC Officials
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has filed a suit against two defendants for the allegedly fraudulent solicitation of Bitcoin (BTC), according to an official press release published on Friday, September 28. The CFTC’s complaint — filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas — charges the two defendants with running two fraudulent businesses and misleading the public to invest in leveraged or margined foreign currency contracts, such as forex, binary options, and diamonds. The first defendant, who goes by the name Morgan Hunt, is reportedly from Arlington, Texas, and owns the company Diamonds Trading …
United States / Sept. 29, 2018
New Rules: US Regulators Extend Their Purview Within Crypto Industry
This week, on the same day, two United States regulating bodies — the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and its ruling organization the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — reported filing objections against non-compliant crypto players who made some false statements regarding their businesses. While the SEC barely needs any introduction for those who follow the crypto industry, FINRA might seem unfamiliar. FINRA is a private, non-federal agency, although it is overseen by the SEC. It regulates one specific part of the securities industry in the U.S.: brokerage firms doing business with the public. What makes the news particularly interesting …
United States / Sept. 15, 2018