New Loom Network CEO clarifies concerning information published by former employee

Published at: Sept. 24, 2020

One of Loom Network's former employees recently leaked information about the company's Kickstarter-funded game, Relentless (also called Zombie Battleground). The leak alleged that the project, and potentially the entire Loom Network, were no longer actively being developed. The former employee, who has not worked for the company in over a year, claimed that the issues largely stemmed from Loom's former CEO, Matthew Campbell. Campbell left Loom in Feb. 2020, and was replaced by a new CEO.

"Dilanka accessed our Kickstarter account without authorization and sent out that rambling update," Vadim Macagon, the current CEO of Loom Network, told Cointelegraph on Sept. 24. "He was let go almost a year ago because he started behaving erratically, and was quite open to some of his team about his drug use (and not just the drugs he mentioned in the update he just published)."

Dilanka's claims

A Sept. 24 tweet from tech expert Bruno Skvorc notified the public of an email sent out to backers of the Relentless project. Cointelegraph reached out to Skvorc for further details, and received a link to the email in question. The email came from "Dilanka," who worked in the project's growth and marketing department. 

Dilanka asserted that both projects were dead, "or at the very least, currently on life support in the middle of an unpleasant pivot focused on healthcare." 

Loom conducted its initial coin offering, or ICO, in 2018. On May 9, 2020, rumors circulated about Loom's potential demise, as evidenced by a lack of communication from the project on various channels. Loom responded to the article through Twitter, asserting the company was still very much alive, but wading through a transition into government and healthcare-based enterprise blockchain work. According to Dilanka, the company has not come forward with any new developments since May 26. Loom's Twitter account, however, uploaded a number of tweets since that time, including a roadmap for the year which was posted on June 30.

Relentless' downfall, and Loom Network's alleged failure as a whole, resulted from "lack of product market fit, mismanagement of resources, incompetent leadership from the founders, and a lack of appreciation and transparency toward you, the community who entrusted us with you hard earned money," Dilanka said, giving his opinion on the situation. 

"I (along with many of our former team) was let go almost a year ago, and the fact that I still have access to this Kickstarter account (which I clearly shouldn't) is another good example of the incompetence I am talking about."

Dilanka, who somehow maintained access to the Kickstarter account associated with the game, said he has received notice of incoming questions about Relentless over the past year from backers looking for updates. 

Dilanka went on to cite a number of issues around the Loom Network, including a lack of communication, as well as questionable actions from former Loom CEO Matthew Campbell.

One example includes Campbell allegedly terminating development on Relentless in 2019, without telling funders, as well as making sure the news did not surface publicly. Loom Network reportedly put more than $1.5 million into building Relentless. 

Dilanka, however, provided a disclaimer:

"I don't know what kind of pressure he [Campbell] was under by investors or what his story is as this is purely my own opinion based on my limited, one dimensional interactions with him as a 'team member' of Loom via Slack. In fact, take all of what I say with a grain of salt — I could be 100% wrong about everything. Do your own due diligence and make up your own mind. But yes, had I not worked remotely and Matt was within proximity, I would have happily punched him in his very punchable face to soften his keyboard warrior tendencies in the interest of teaching him some manners... and yes, I made sure to tell Matt (and Luke et al.) [other Loom brass] how I felt about him when things started to go south."

Macagon's explanation

Loom Network's current CEO, Macagon, provided insights from the other side of the table. "I'm not going to comment on the outright slander against Matthew Campbell, instead, I'll focus on the facts," he said. "Dilanka didn't lie about the fact that Loom spent more than $1.5 million USD on the game, after all, it was part of our core thesis during the first stage of our startup." Macagon explained the Kickstarter funding resulted in less than $300,000.

The company put the aforementioned $1.5 million toward constructing "a playable real time game running fully on chain with its own APIs and block explorers," Macagon said. Relentless boasted an entire experience built on blockchain. More than $200,000 of the $1.5 million was used for marketing — the department in which Dilanka worked. 

"We didn't sell any cards over a few dollars, host any NFT auctions, nor engage in any crypto style fundraising," Macagon said. Relentless stood as the result of significant time and effort by the team, in part evident in the project's Github activity. Public appreciation, involvement and popularity never caught on, however, the CEO explained. He said that despite the team trying all conceivable approaches, success proved elusive, spurring the company in a different direction while leaving the game behind.

"I understand that drama is always interesting, but compared to most of the drama in the crypto space, ZombieBattleground is just a normal startup failure," Macagon said, adding:

"I can understand Dilanka's frustration to a certain extent, though I don't understand the state of mind that led him to access our Kickstarter account without authorization, and then publicly admit to breaking contracts and potentially laws. Dilanka is no whistle-blower, he's just high on something."
Tags
Related Posts
MicroStrategy’s now-bullish CEO explains why he bashed Bitcoin back in 2013
Back in 2013, Michael Saylor, CEO of business intelligence giant MicroStrategy, posted a tweet against Bitcoin (BTC), forecasting a grim future for the asset. Fast-forward to 2020, during which Saylor's company now holds a major bullish position in BTC. #Bitcoin days are numbered. It seems like just a matter of time before it suffers the same fate as online gambling. — Michael Saylor (@michael_saylor) December 19, 2013 "I literally forgot I ever said that," Saylor told Morgan Creek Digital co-founder Anthony Pompliano during a podcast interview posted on Wednesday. Recent weeks have seen MicroStrategy turn bullish on Bitcoin, buying 21,454 …
Adoption / Sept. 16, 2020
‘Halving’ Mentions Spike on Twitter and in Crypto Media
With less than three weeks until the halving, the subject has overtaken the coronavirus as a leading Bitcoin narrative on Twitter — and it’s once again starting to dominate media coverage. On April 23, crypto social sentiment analysis firm TheTIE published data to Twitter showing that discussion concerning the ‘halving’ ranked as the ninth-most discussed topic related to Bitcoin (BTC) on Twitter, with 650 tweets on the topic. Bitcoin discussions relating to gold, meanwhile, comprised 690 tweets. Crypto analyst Mati Greenspan told Cointelegraph: “The virus along with the current economic situation has completely drowned out all conversation about the halving …
Bitcoin / April 24, 2020
Bitcoin advocate criticized for backing wallet authentication project
Crypto Twitter has gone after Nic Carter, a prominent advocate of Bitcoin (BTC), for his involvement in Dynamic, a third-party wallet authentication project that could potentially prevent wallet transactions to be performed if a wallet is categorized as risky. In a tweet, Carter shared his excitement in backing the project, tweeting Dynamic's announcement about a recently completed $7.5 million raise led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). Following this, users flocked to Carter’s Twitter, expressing their disappointment because of the move. Twitter user Lifetheuniverce argued that what Dynamic is creating is the “antitheses of what Bitcoin was created for.” The Twitter user …
Blockchain / June 29, 2022
Community slams NYT for its latest 'sympathy piece' on FTX's Bankman-Fried
The online community including some cryptocurrency figures has condemned the latest so-called “sympathy” articles from The New York Times — written about FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried. Throughout the article published on Dec. 26 titled In the Bahamas, a Lingering Sympathy for Sam Bankman-Fried, The New York Times journalist Rob Copeland interviewed local Bahamians who appeared to have mostly positive things to say about the cryptocurrency exchange founder. One resident opined he had a “good heart” with another local saying they “feel bad for him.” A resident interviewed for the article even said it “doesn't make any sense” that Bankman-Fried’s alleged …
Business / Dec. 27, 2022
More details emerge on Twitter Coins — and crypto's not included
References to crypto or blockchain technology are nowhere to be found in newly leaked images concerning “Twitter Coins” — the platform’s secret in-development digital asset. First leaked in early December by tech bloggers Jane Manchun Wong and Nima Owji, many have been hoping that the secret “Twitter Coins” project would involve cryptocurrency in some way. Members of the Dogecoin (DOGE) community have been especially hopeful given Twitter CEO Musk’s affiliation with the token. In a Dec. 4 Twitter Spaces, when Musk said he was still interested in integrating crypto with the social media platform. However, newly leaked images of the …
Business / Jan. 11, 2023