Bitcoin Block Battle: Top Corporations Support BIP 101 as Debate Rages On

Published at: Aug. 29, 2015

The battle rages on within the Bitcoin community on how to move forward with potential hard fork changes designed to accommodate larger block sizes. Jeff Garzik’s BIP 100 proposal has taken the mining industry by storm, gathering a majority of support of those currently voting. Meanwhile, Bitcoin corporate leaders have formed a united front around the proposal by Mike Hearn and Gavin Andresen called BIP 101.

Which side are you on?

On Tuesday, August 24, the leaders of many of the largest Bitcoin companies in the world signed off on BIP 101 as their revision of choice. They crafted a manifesto declaring a solid vote of confidence of BIP 101. For details on how BIP 101 works, click here to see the details on GitHub, posted by Gavin Andresen.

The Chief Executive Officers include Stephen Pair of BitPay, Peter Smith of Blockchain.info, Jeremy Allaire and Sean Neville of Circle, Sam Cole of KNCMiner, John McDonnell of Bitnet.io, Charles Cascarilla of itBit, Wences Caseres of Xapo, and Mike Belshe of BitGo. An excerpt reads:

We support the implementation of BIP101. We have found Gavins arguments on both the need for larger blocks and the feasibility of their implementation, while safeguarding Bitcoins decentralization, to be convincing. Our companies will be ready for larger blocks by December 2015 and we will run code that supports this.

As our community grows, it is essential, now more than ever, that we seek strong consensus to ensure network reliability. We pledge to support BIP101 in our software and systems by December 2015, and we encourage others to join us.

This high level of corporate support has not been shared by the voting mining community. In fact, quite the opposite, as those who are voting over the last month have flocked towards Jeff Garzik’s BIP 100 proposal, as we have reported here.

Bitcoin Block Size Debate Reaches The Alex Jones Show

Other community leaders have spoken out on this issue. Julia Tourianski of BraveTheWorld.com was the guest host on the Alex Jones Show on Friday and responded to a caller’s question about this issue directly.

“Bitcoin XT is a terrible idea, and I would take the other core engineers and developers much more seriously,” Tourianski replied on air. “(They) are organizing an event in Montreal (“Scaling Bitcoin”) in September to have an open dialogue about the changes, and how we can implement them incrementally, and what is the best way of going about it.”

Tags
Related Posts
Bitcoin Block Size, Explained
Why did Bitcoin fork and split? The inability of the community to find consensus regarding a proposal to increase the block size resulted in a user-activated hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain in August 2017. While numerous proposals advocating a change to the block size limit had failed to gather the support required to manifest change, transaction fees had skyrocketed by mid-2017. During August 2015, the average BTC transaction fee was just $0.50. However, by June 2017, median fees had increased 10x to approximate $5. With nearly half of the world’s population living on less than $5.50 per day, high …
Blockchain / July 24, 2019
Ethereum Classic Devs Building a ‘Chainhopping’ Bridge Between ETH and ETC
San Francisco-based incubator for the blockchain Ethereum Classic (ETC), ETC Labs, has announced that it will create a solution for Ethereum (ETH)/ETC interoperability in a collaboration with Metronome, in an official blog post on June 27. Per the announcement, blockchain interoperability—also referred to as “chainhopping”—is a property of a blockchain asset meaning that it can be transferred between separate blockchains. In this case, the cryptocurrency Metronome (MET) will be transferable between the ETH and ETC blockchains. The ETH and ETC blockchains initially split in the summer of 2016 after a contentious vote to return money lost when The DAO collapsed …
Blockchain / June 28, 2019
Bad Day For Bitcoin But Community Saves The Day
If you had the pleasure to watch ‘The Revenant’, you might have noticed how nature helps, as well as torments, the protagonist during his struggle to survive. And it is this protagonist who, despite facing the harshest evils, triumphs over his insufferable pains. He emerges as a hero — tormented yet alive. It might sound like an exaggerated comparison but Bitcoin has seen this same struggle. It had a wonderful year in 2015, with lots of investments and adoptions coming its way. In terms of trading, Bitcoin was named the most profitable investment of 2015 by many mainstream media outlets. …
Bitcoin / Jan. 31, 2016
KnC Miner, Slush Pool & BitFury at Odds Over Block Size Increase
Three of the biggest Western mining pools – representing a total of some 19% of hashing power on the Bitcoin network – stand divided on raising the block size limit. An inquiry by Cointelegraph has shown that both KnCMiner and Slush Pool are in favor of Gavin Andresen's proposal(s) to raise this limit. But the biggest of the three, BitFury, is more conservative. As such, a network-wide switch to Bitcoin XT to allow for bigger blocks seems even more unlikely, for now. Block Size Limit Lacking consensus among Core developers on how and when to raise the block size limit, …
Bitcoin Mining / July 7, 2015
Bitcoin SegWit adoption lags among major exchanges: Glassnode
SegWit has come a long way since its first appearance during the 2015-2017 blocksize war. However, despite its relative success as a Bitcoin upgrade, crypto exchanges including Binance and Gemini are still not committed to using SegWit addresses for sending Bitcoin (BTC). Implemented in 2017, segregated witness (SegWit) is a soft fork upgrade that separates “witness” data from the base transaction. In an “explain like I’m five” kind of way, SegWit allows for a safer and faster Bitcoin, making scaling the network easier. While most exchanges and individuals were quick to upgrade their infrastructure to take on SegWit, reaching the …
Adoption / Feb. 4, 2022