Regulators and industry leaders react to Biden‘s executive order on crypto

Published at: March 9, 2022

Joe Biden has signed his 82nd executive order since being sworn into office in January 2021, directly addressing a regulatory framework for digital assets in a rare moment for the U.S. President.

In a Wednesday announcement, the White House said President Biden's executive order required government agencies to explore the potential rollout of a United States central bank digital currency as well as coordinate and consolidate policy on a national framework for crypto. Many media outlets previously reported the U.S. President had initially planned to sign the executive order in February, an event that was likely postponed following Russia’s military actions in Ukraine.

The reaction from many industry leaders compared the executive order to a regulatory opportunity — Biden had rarely spoken directly about crypto and blockchain during his presidency. Reports suggested that the situation with Russia potentially using digital currency to evade U.S. sanctions may have contributed to the U.S. President not waiting longer. The executive order mentioned the risks of circumventing sanctions three times, a sentiment echoed by National Economic Council Director Brian Deese and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan:

“The approach outlined in the E.O. will reinforce U.S. leadership in the global financial system and safeguard the long-term efficacy of critical national security tools like sanctions and anti-money laundering frameworks.”

Lawmakers and regulators were quick to chime in on the executive order. Treasury Secretary Janey Yellen, who may have prematurely released her statement on the matter, said the EO could “result in substantial benefits for the nation, consumers, and businesses” in supporting innovation while addressing industry risk. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has often associated cryptocurrencies with illicit acts, said Biden was “right to spotlight crypto’s risks,” adding that the U.S. government needed “strong rules before it’s too late.”

“While I agree with the President's desire to combat money laundering and defend America's national security, I think his executive order misses the fact that the overwhelming majority of digital asset users are law-abiding and trying to make our financial system better,” said Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Bitcoin (BTC) HODLer who has taken a pro-crypto stance on many pieces of legislation. “We need thoughtful rules around stablecoins, and though I remain unconvinced on the need for a central bank digital currency, I will continue to follow the Federal Reserve's work in this area closely.”

Related: Crypto could bypass President Biden's 'devastating' sanctions on Russian banks and elites: Report

The Crypto Council for Innovation, a coalition of crypto firms originally formed in April 2021 that includes major exchanges including Coinbase and Gemini, described the EO as a “holistic and informed” approach to cryptocurrencies. The group added it would likely lead to regulatory clarity, responsible financial innovative, and a more inclusive economy.

“We look forward to working in partnership with regulators and policymakers in the coming months to develop smart policies that bolster America’s position as a global leader of crypto innovation,” said the CCI. “Collaboration is crucial.”

President Biden has signed the EO recognizing the tremendous potential of crypto. It reflects the importance of crypto to the American people. We share the President’s commitment to responsible financial innovation and a more fair, inclusive economy. Full statement below. pic.twitter.com/GUINxBeBQG

— Crypto Council for Innovation (@crypto_council) March 9, 2022

Jeremy Allaire, co-founder and CEO of crypto payments firm Circle, added:

“For those of us in the crypto community, IMHO this E.O. should be viewed as the single biggest opportunity to engage with policy makers on the issues that matters. The proverbial doors of policymakers are WIDE OPEN, this is now a NATIONAL conversation in the U.S.”
Tags
Law
Related Posts
Crypto, Congress and the Commission: What’s next for the ‘Wild West’?
The entire cryptocurrency industry is waking up to a new reality. Politicians and regulators have decided to wade into the space, which had flown mainly under their radar until now. A House committee chair is launching a working group; the Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking new authorities to regulate digital assets as securities; and the Senate-passed infrastructure bill includes $28 billion in tax revenues from crypto transactions. This last handful of weeks has arguably seen more regulatory activity around digital currencies since the name Satoshi Nakamoto first entered the popular lexicon. Anyone whose business deals in this asset class …
Bitcoin / Aug. 28, 2021
Law Decoded: Russia flounders, America competes, IMF keeps fuming, Jan. 24–31
One of the most fascinating implications of the collision between traditional political institutions and the crypto space is how it can reveal the glaring lack of cohesion within power systems that otherwise look monolithic. Digital assets reside in a parallel policy dimension where neither a centralized consensus nor a clear rulebook exists, leading to a surprising variety of voices and opinions emerging in the absence of a politically coordinated course. Last week, a rare lively policy debate broke out in Russia in the aftermath of its central bank’s attempt to promote a hardline stance on crypto. One does not often …
Regulation / Jan. 31, 2022
Stealth rulemaking: Is proposed SEC rule with no mention of crypto a threat to DeFi?
On Jan. 26, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission proposed amendments to Rule 3b-16 under the Exchange Act that lacks any mention of digital assets or decentralized finance, which could adversely affect platforms that facilitate crypto transactions. Some cryptocurrency advocates — including SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce — believe that the commission’s extended definition of an exchange could thrust an entire class of crypto entities under the regulator’s jurisdiction, subjecting them to additional registration and reporting burdens. How real is the threat? The proposed change The amendments proposed by the regulator dramatically expand the definition of what an exchange is …
Regulation / Feb. 5, 2022
Regulators have a weak case against FTX on deposit insurance
In a cease-and-desist letter to fast-growing crypto exchange FTX, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) shed light on a now-deleted tweet from the exchange’s president, Brett Harrison, and issued a stark warning over the company’s messaging. Harrison’s original tweet said, “Direct deposits from employers to FTX US are stored in individually FDIC-insured bank accounts in the users’ names.” He added, “Stocks are held in FDIC-insured and SIPC [Security Investor Protection Corporation]-insured brokerage accounts.” Although Harrison stewarded FTX to its best-ever year in 2021, increasing revenue by 1,000%, the firm now faces the unenviable prospect of running afoul of a powerful …
Regulation / Aug. 26, 2022
Crypto developers should work with the SEC to find common ground
Regulators are tasked with balancing between protecting consumers and creating environments where entrepreneurs and the private sector can thrive. When markets face distortions, perhaps due to an externality or information asymmetry, regulation can play an important role. But regulation can also stifle entrepreneurship and business formation, leaving society and its people worse off. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has been particularly hostile against cryptocurrency companies and entrepreneurs. For example, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has remarked that he views Bitcoin (BTC) as a commodity but that many other “crypto financial assets have the key attributes of a security.” He …
Technology / Aug. 30, 2022